Running shoe technology: what the names on the box actually do
Twenty technologies, part by part, and whether each one is worth paying for.
Twenty technologies, part by part, and whether each one is worth paying for.
Each part is judged against what the shoe is actually for – the activity, the shape of the foot, the ground underneath. Every technology is shown with a few trainers that carry it, and with the cases where it does nothing for you. Very little in this industry is good at everything, and the names on the box rarely say which is which.
A membrane between the lining and the upper: it stops water getting in and lets vapour out, though more slowly than plain mesh does. It earns its place in rain, slush and snow – and it is worth saying plainly that a waterproof shoe which does fill up, over the collar, then stays full.
An open-cell foam insole that OrthoLite makes and sells on to dozens of brands, which is why the same name turns up in shoes that have nothing else in common. It breathes better than the standard EVA insole and flattens more slowly, so the shoe keeps its feel for longer. It is a comfort layer, not a speed one – and it is the first thing to come out if you wear your own orthotics.
Two different Adidas foams under one heading. Boost is made of fused TPU capsules: it returns more energy than almost anything else and, unusually, does not go stiff in the cold – which is worth something between November and March. It is also heavy. Lightstrike is EVA-based, lighter and firmer, meant for quicker work. Long easy miles and cold mornings favour Boost; sessions and race day favour Lightstrike.
React is the foam; Air is the pressurised gas unit. React cushions along the whole length of the sole and holds up well without packing down. Air cushions at one point, usually under the heel. In the running models what you feel is the React; on the lifestyle models the visible window is doing more for the look than for your stride.
Foams with nitrogen forced into them under pressure – lighter and springier than plain EVA at the same volume. The difference shows up when you push off hard, which means when you run fast. At an easy pace the advantage over a good EVA is small, and the shoes that carry it cost noticeably more.
Geometry rather than material: the sole is curved like a rocking chair and rolls the foot forward for you. It saves the ankle and the calf a good deal of work over long hours on your feet, which is why it gets recommended while coming back from injury. The cost is stability – at walking pace and on uneven ground it feels tippy, and it is no use at all for side-to-side work in the gym.
A soft, high-volume New Balance foam: it takes the impact rather than handing it back. That makes long easy miles kinder on the knees, and it suits a heavier runner particularly well. For tempo work and racing there are more responsive foams – several of them in New Balance’s own range.
A light Asics foam with an obvious bounce, and the reason the Novablast has the following it does. It makes easy miles genuinely enjoyable. The stack is tall, though, so on a rutted path or through a sharp change of direction the shoe rolls under you.
Brooks foam with nitrogen blown into it. Soft underfoot without the dead, sunken feeling that plain soft EVA gives after a few miles, which is why it carries the Glycerin and the Ghost Max. Softness is not speed: a foam this compliant absorbs more than it returns, and like every soft foam it packs down sooner than a firm one.
Not a foam at all. Two raised walls sit either side of the heel and do nothing until the heel rolls further than it should, at which point they stop it. Brooks call it holistic support because it works on the movement rather than on the arch. Worth knowing what it is not: it is not arch support, and on a gait that never over-rolls it simply never engages.
Saucony use the name for a family, not one material. Plain PWRRUN is an EVA and TPU blend, PWRRUN+ is lighter and springier, and PWRRUN PB is the PEBA in the race shoes and feels like a different shoe altogether. The name on the box therefore tells you less than it looks: check which of the three is actually in the model.
The hollow pods under an On. They collapse on landing and lock as you push off, which gives the brand its distinctive feel underfoot – people tend to either take to it immediately or not at all. The pods are open to the ground, so on gravel and trails they pick up stones, and the newer models close them off for exactly that reason.
The compound the pods are moulded from. On claim it holds its rebound across temperatures, which matters more in a British winter than the marketing suggests – most foams stiffen in the cold. Helion is a family name too, covering several versions, so it says which house the foam belongs to rather than what it does in a given shoe.
A stiff carbon-fibre sheet set inside the foam. It creates no energy – it changes where yours goes, resisting the toe joint as it bends so less of the push-off is spent folding the foot. Shoes built around one measure roughly 4% better running economy in the lab, but that figure belongs to the whole shoe, foam included, not to the plate. The cost is stiffness, which loads the calf and the Achilles differently: ease into them. World Athletics allows one plate and a 40 mm stack, which is why every race shoe stops at exactly 40.
A rubber compound licensed from the tyre company. The difference shows on wet tarmac, exactly where an ordinary outsole starts to let go – which, in this country, is most of the year. On dry ground the advantage is slight, and the rubber adds both grams and pounds to the price.
A hard Asics rubber placed where the sole wears fastest: the outer edge of the heel and the forefoot. It adds real miles to the life of the shoe. It also weighs more than foam, which is why it appears in patches rather than across the whole sole.
Nike’s original waffle pattern: square lugs that hold on tarmac and on a packed path alike. It is a genuine all-rounder, with the usual catch – in mud the squares clog, and on wet rock they slide.
A thin rubber laid in patches over Hoka’s foam sole, only where the wear actually happens. It keeps the weight down and leaves the shoe soft. It also wears through faster than a full rubber outsole, particularly on road miles with a heel strike on the outer edge.
Puma’s rubber, standard across the NITRO range. One of the few places where the difference is immediate: it holds on wet tarmac and on painted surfaces – underpasses, multi-storey car parks, the tiled bit outside a supermarket. The trade is a firmer feel underfoot.
Not one rubber but a family of compounds and patterns, combined according to the ground the shoe is built for. On soft, churned-up trail the deep lugs dig in and hold. The same lugs on tarmac and rock wear down quickly and you feel every one of them through the sole.
There is no formula. Beyond everything below, a good deal of it comes down to what feels right on the day. What follows are the factors worth weighing up, each with a link straight to its own section.
Every sport and every surface asks for a different sole. The first decision is where and how the shoes will be worn; everything else follows from it. Below are the three common cases and what the sole has to do in each.
The shape of the foot, the height of the arch and the way the foot rolls as it lands decide which category of shoe fits: neutral, stability or cushioned. Below are the three types of pronation, a test you can do at home with a bucket of water, and how the answer turns into a shoe category.
Pronation is the way the foot rolls inward as it takes your weight. It is a normal, useful movement – it is how the foot absorbs a landing. It matters here because too much of it, or too little, changes which shoe will support you and which will leave you nursing an injury.
Your footprint gives it away
Normal arch
The foot lands on the outer edge of the heel and rolls gently inward – just enough to spread the impact.
Look for: neutral shoes
Flat or low arch
The foot rolls too far inward and the weight settles on the inside edge. Commonly associated with knee pain and shin splints.
Look for: stability or motion control
High arch
The weight stays on the outer edge and the landing never gets properly absorbed. Commonly associated with stress fractures.
Look for: maximum cushioning
Every model I currently list is neutral – cushioned, with no pronation-control system built in. The full list is in the table.
| Pronation | Arch | What it needs | Shoe category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | Normal | Balance | Neutral |
| Overpronation | Low or collapsing | Support | Stability / motion control |
| Supination | High | Cushioning | Neutral, heavily cushioned |
Body weight decides how much cushioning and support a shoe has to provide, and how quickly it will wear out. The scale below gives the foam types that tend to suit each band.
Body weight is the single factor that wears a shoe out fastest, because everything it adds goes straight through the midsole.
The details that decide whether you actually wear the shoes: sizing and the thumb rule, the width of the toe box, heel drop, breathability. Plus a few things worth checking before you get to the till.
A handful of checks that take a minute each and save a good deal of regret:
Before any of that, the number itself: the UK shoe size chart in centimetres gives the foot length behind each size, how to measure yours, and what each brand does differently with the same number.
A sole that curves up at the front helps the foot roll forward instead of pushing off, which takes load off the toes and the calf. Useful over long distances and while coming back from injury.
The height difference between heel and forefoot. A low drop gives a more natural posture and loads the calf more; a high drop protects the heel. Changing it sharply is the classic way to pick up an Achilles problem, so move gradually.
A wide toe box matters if you have broad feet or a bunion (hallux valgus). Several brands publish a wide fitting alongside the standard one – it is worth asking for, rather than sizing up.
I run, I walk, and I spend far too long reading spec sheets. This site is where I put what I find out: what holds up over the miles, and what turns out to be a word printed on a box.
Where the technologies in the tables came from: who came up with them, what problem they were solving, and why they look the way they do.